<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Pyrolitical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pyrolitical.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pyrolitical.com</link>
	<description>Politics, Principles, and Liberty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:30:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Political Potpourri: Federalist Paper 10 &#8211; Factions &#8211; 1-26-2010 by Today on Pyrolitical.com March 8, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.pyrolitical.com/2010/03/political-potpourri-federalist-paper-10-factions-1-26-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Today on Pyrolitical.com March 8, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pyrolitical.com/?p=1753#comment-338</guid>
		<description>[...] Political Potpourri: Federalist Paper 10 – Factions – 1-26-2010 Listen in as we talk about how if you think that &#8220;partisanship&#8221; is just a problem in our times? Think again! The Founders were very concerned about special interest groups, or &#8220;factions,&#8221; and the destructive role they can play in breaking apart the Republic. In Federalist Paper No. 10, James Madison wrote about the danger [...] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Political Potpourri: Federalist Paper 10 – Factions – 1-26-2010 Listen in as we talk about how if you think that &#8220;partisanship&#8221; is just a problem in our times? Think again! The Founders were very concerned about special interest groups, or &#8220;factions,&#8221; and the destructive role they can play in breaking apart the Republic. In Federalist Paper No. 10, James Madison wrote about the danger [...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where&#8217;s the Charity in Force? by Leonard Olds</title>
		<link>http://www.pyrolitical.com/2009/12/wheres-the-charity-in-force/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonard Olds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 05:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pyrolitical.com/?p=1523#comment-336</guid>
		<description>Any government &quot;insurance&quot; program is a misuse of the term &quot;insurance&quot;.

This includes the FDIC, the proposed Health insurance Program, and especially the so-called &quot;social security insurance&quot; program.  For those of you who are old enough to remember, social security was initially promoted as an &quot;insurance&quot; program.  Only in recent years when the ponzi aspect of social security became undeniable has the government tried to rewrite history and  tried to claim that it was never intended as a insurance program.

Like Pinnochio, with every lie like this the government&#039;s nose gets longer and longer.  Some of you remember the lie that our social security number was not intended to be an identification program a statement which was actually printed on my first social security card.

Get the government out of these fraudulent insurance programs including all their regulations of private programs and we can finally have affordable real insurance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any government &#8220;insurance&#8221; program is a misuse of the term &#8220;insurance&#8221;.</p>
<p>This includes the FDIC, the proposed Health insurance Program, and especially the so-called &#8220;social security insurance&#8221; program.  For those of you who are old enough to remember, social security was initially promoted as an &#8220;insurance&#8221; program.  Only in recent years when the ponzi aspect of social security became undeniable has the government tried to rewrite history and  tried to claim that it was never intended as a insurance program.</p>
<p>Like Pinnochio, with every lie like this the government&#8217;s nose gets longer and longer.  Some of you remember the lie that our social security number was not intended to be an identification program a statement which was actually printed on my first social security card.</p>
<p>Get the government out of these fraudulent insurance programs including all their regulations of private programs and we can finally have affordable real insurance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economic Concepts: Foreign Aiding and Abetting &#8211; 1-19-2010 by Today on Pyrolitical.com March 4, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.pyrolitical.com/2010/03/economic-concepts-foreign-aiding-and-abetting-1-19-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-333</link>
		<dc:creator>Today on Pyrolitical.com March 4, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pyrolitical.com/?p=1749#comment-333</guid>
		<description>[...] Economic Concepts: Foreign Aiding and Abetting – 1-19-2010 Listen in while we discuss how due to the recent horrific events in Haiti President Obama has committed $100 million in monetary aid by US tax payers. He has also expressed our country&#8217;s intention to help rebuild the nation over the long term. Historically, America has given trillions of dollars to foreign nations in the [...] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Economic Concepts: Foreign Aiding and Abetting – 1-19-2010 Listen in while we discuss how due to the recent horrific events in Haiti President Obama has committed $100 million in monetary aid by US tax payers. He has also expressed our country&#8217;s intention to help rebuild the nation over the long term. Historically, America has given trillions of dollars to foreign nations in the [...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Indian Nations by Today on Pyrolitical.com March 2, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.pyrolitical.com/2010/03/indian-nations/comment-page-1/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Today on Pyrolitical.com March 2, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 02:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pyrolitical.com/?p=1775#comment-331</guid>
		<description>[...] Indian Nations When did all of the Indian tribes become part of the United States and cease to be considered independent nations &#8211; in 1796, 1830, or 1871? Answer: 1871. (By a congressional act that year, all of the American Indian tribes became, for the first time, part of the United States.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Indian Nations When did all of the Indian tribes become part of the United States and cease to be considered independent nations &#8211; in 1796, 1830, or 1871? Answer: 1871. (By a congressional act that year, all of the American Indian tribes became, for the first time, part of the United States.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Has The Advantage? by Today on Pyrolitical.com March 1, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.pyrolitical.com/2010/03/who-has-the-advantage/comment-page-1/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Today on Pyrolitical.com March 1, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 02:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pyrolitical.com/?p=1771#comment-330</guid>
		<description>[...] Who Has The Advantage? Each state has an equal number of two Senators. Is this an advantage to the large states or to the small states? Answer: The Small States. (Wyoming, with a very small population, has as much representation in the Senate as the most populous states.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who Has The Advantage? Each state has an equal number of two Senators. Is this an advantage to the large states or to the small states? Answer: The Small States. (Wyoming, with a very small population, has as much representation in the Senate as the most populous states.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Representative Waiting Period by Today on Pyrolitical.com February 28, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.pyrolitical.com/2010/02/representative-waiting-period/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Today on Pyrolitical.com February 28, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 03:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pyrolitical.com/?p=1727#comment-329</guid>
		<description>[...] Representative Waiting Period How long must a person be a citizen before he can become a member of the House of Representatives &#8211; two years, three years, five years, or seven years? Answer: Seven Years Reference: Article 1, Section 2, Clause 2. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Representative Waiting Period How long must a person be a citizen before he can become a member of the House of Representatives &#8211; two years, three years, five years, or seven years? Answer: Seven Years Reference: Article 1, Section 2, Clause 2. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When Does Congress Meet? by Today on Pyrolitical.com February 27, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.pyrolitical.com/2010/02/when-does-congress-meet/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Today on Pyrolitical.com February 27, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 02:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pyrolitical.com/?p=1725#comment-326</guid>
		<description>[...] When Does Congress Meet? Who chooses when Congress meets each year? Does the President indicate, does Congress make its own choice, or does Congress meet on a certain day automatically?Answer: They convene automatically. (One of the worst abuses of the kings of England was their power to convent and dissolve the Parliament at will. The United States Constitution avoids [...] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When Does Congress Meet? Who chooses when Congress meets each year? Does the President indicate, does Congress make its own choice, or does Congress meet on a certain day automatically?Answer: They convene automatically. (One of the worst abuses of the kings of England was their power to convent and dissolve the Parliament at will. The United States Constitution avoids [...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Woodrow Wilson and Woman&#8217;s Suffrage by Today on Pyrolitical.com February 26, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.pyrolitical.com/2010/02/woodrow-wilson-and-womans-suffrage/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Today on Pyrolitical.com February 26, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pyrolitical.com/?p=1721#comment-325</guid>
		<description>[...] Woodrow Wilson and Woman’s Suffrage Woodrow Wilson was the President who asked Congress to pass a women&#8217;s suffrage amendment. How did he feel about the issue personally? Answer: He opposed the amendment. (He recommended the amendment to Congress only after bowing to public pressure.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Woodrow Wilson and Woman’s Suffrage Woodrow Wilson was the President who asked Congress to pass a women&#8217;s suffrage amendment. How did he feel about the issue personally? Answer: He opposed the amendment. (He recommended the amendment to Congress only after bowing to public pressure.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Constitutional Principles: Article 1, Section 7 &#8211; The Legislative Process &#8211; 1-5-2010 by Today on Pyrolitical.com February 25, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.pyrolitical.com/2010/02/constitutional-principles-article-1-section-7-the-legislative-process-1-5-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Today on Pyrolitical.com February 25, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 02:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pyrolitical.com/?p=1744#comment-324</guid>
		<description>[...] Constitutional Principles: Article 1, Section 7 – The Legislative Process – 1-5-2010 Listen to our monthly episode on the constitution Article 1 Section 7. We discuss the legislative process and how it affects the maintenance of liberty in these United States. Both in the presentation and open discussion we find many principles and how they are being applied (or not) in washington today, as well as historically. Don&#8217;t [...] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Constitutional Principles: Article 1, Section 7 – The Legislative Process – 1-5-2010 Listen to our monthly episode on the constitution Article 1 Section 7. We discuss the legislative process and how it affects the maintenance of liberty in these United States. Both in the presentation and open discussion we find many principles and how they are being applied (or not) in washington today, as well as historically. Don&#8217;t [...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Alaska Purchase by Today on Pyrolitical.com February 24, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.pyrolitical.com/2010/02/the-alaska-purchase/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Today on Pyrolitical.com February 24, 2010 &#124; Randall Hinton's Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 02:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pyrolitical.com/?p=1714#comment-322</guid>
		<description>[...] The Alaska Purchase From whom did the United States purchase Alaska in 1867? Answer: Russia (The Purchase Price was $7.2 million.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Alaska Purchase From whom did the United States purchase Alaska in 1867? Answer: Russia (The Purchase Price was $7.2 million.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
